lunedì 5 luglio 2010

Proposal for review's status message

This is just a proposal for the status message that we want to use for the review's demo.

=== Status ===
Channel name: system
Socket: /tmp/system
Request: status
Response: {lat=12.345, lon=12.345, head=35.5, speed=0.5, stream_x=1.55, stream_y=1.55, wat_t=20, nit=11.5, o=11.5, eh=11.5, ph=11.5, cond=11.5, turb=11.5}
Note: the new parameters are: wat_t (water temperature), nit (nitrates), o (dissolved oxygen), eh (potential oxid-reductive), ph, cond (conductivity), turb (turbidity).

Please, comment it for any kind of problems.

2 commenti:

  1. I'd suggest we use explicative names whenever possible. Thus replacing wat_t with water_temperature, turb with turbidity, cond with conductivity and nit with nitrates. We can leave o, ph and eh because they're well'known chemical acronyms.
    What do you think?

    RispondiElimina
  2. ok, this is the new status message:

    {lat=12.345, lon=12.345, head=35.5, speed=0.5, stream_x=1.55, stream_y=1.55, water_temperature=20, nitrates=11.5, o=11.5, eh=11.5, ph=11.5, conductivity=11.5, turbidity=11.5}

    RispondiElimina